Skip to content

For Australian business owners choosing a useful first scope

AI automation services built around what your team needs next.

Connect a department handover, prepare checked work with AI, get your systems to agree or diagnose the right place to start. We define the deliverable and the responsibility around it before choosing the tool.

Who it is for

You have the tools. The work still gets stuck.

We work with Australian owners and operations teams whose records move between people, spreadsheets and software such as Xero, HubSpot, Microsoft 365 and ServiceM8. We check the exact access and operations before promising a connection.

Start with one recurring handover and the person who receives it. You do not need to decide whether it needs workflow automation, an integration or an agent before the first conversation.

Choose the work you want to change

Four ways to make a useful first move.

01

Business process automation

We connect the whole handover, from the first complete record to the next person’s usable work. Your team keeps the decisions that need judgement. The system handles the checks, preparation and follow through.

Explore business process automation

An accepted handover should contain the agreed scope, its revision, a delivery owner, the next due action and the records needed to continue. A status change alone is not enough.

  • A complete delivery brief instead of another forwarded email
  • Clear authority for changes to scope, dates and budget

Your handover packet

Business process automation

An accepted handover should contain the agreed scope, its revision, a delivery owner, the next due action and the records needed to continue. A status change alone is not enough.

  • A complete delivery brief instead of another forwarded email
  • Clear authority for changes to scope, dates and budget
  • A billing preparation pack tied to accepted work
  • One exception queue with a named owner

The price moves with the number of departments, conflicting records, approval branches and recovery cases. We choose a useful end-to-end slice before widening the scope. Replacing every business system is not a prerequisite.

Read the full service scope
02

AI agent development

We build agents that gather permitted information, check what they found and prepare something your team can use. You can inspect the sources, see what remains uncertain and keep approval over consequential actions.

Explore ai agent development

The useful output is a checked evidence packet and a draft. A fluent paragraph without a source trail is not enough for a business decision.

  • A research packet with source references and unresolved questions
  • A draft prepared from the evidence your team permits

Your handover packet

AI agent development

The useful output is a checked evidence packet and a draft. A fluent paragraph without a source trail is not enough for a business decision.

  • A research packet with source references and unresolved questions
  • A draft prepared from the evidence your team permits
  • A visible limit on tools, spending and attempts
  • Human approval before an external commitment

Cost depends on the knowledge sources, permitted tools, evaluation cases, approval interface and consequences of a wrong answer. Model usage varies with context and tool calls. We set a budget and measure representative cases rather than promise a fixed cost for every question.

Read the full service scope
03

System integration

We connect your CRM, operations and finance tools around a clear rule for each field. Your team can see what changed, which source is authoritative and whether the destination actually accepted it.

Explore system integration

A completed sync should name the source revision, destination ID and confirmed result. Matching names alone is not enough to decide two records are the same customer.

  • A stable identity across different systems
  • An agreed owner for every shared field

Your handover packet

System integration

A completed sync should name the source revision, destination ID and confirmed result. Matching names alone is not enough to decide two records are the same customer.

  • A stable identity across different systems
  • An agreed owner for every shared field
  • A review queue for genuine disagreements
  • A receipt that confirms the intended write

The important variables are field ownership, historical cleanup, identity matching, API access, volume and the number of directions data can travel. Two-way synchronisation needs explicit conflict rules and may cost more than a carefully bounded one-way flow.

Read the full service scope
04

Automation audit

Find the process worth fixing, the dependencies that could stop it and the scope a builder can actually quote. Our audit is a paid diagnostic, credited on signing. We agree its fee and boundaries before work begins.

Explore automation audit

The diagnostic ends in a decision document. It should be useful even if you choose to delay the build, improve the underlying process or use another implementation partner.

  • A process map with owners and missing handovers
  • Ranked opportunities with explicit assumptions

Your handover packet

Automation audit

The diagnostic ends in a decision document. It should be useful even if you choose to delay the build, improve the underlying process or use another implementation partner.

  • A process map with owners and missing handovers
  • Ranked opportunities with explicit assumptions
  • A dependency and failure review
  • A written first-build scope and recommendation

This is a paid diagnostic credited on signing. We do not publish a fixed audit fee because the number of processes, systems, stakeholders and existing workflows changes the work. Your written audit scope confirms the fee, access boundaries and deliverables before we begin. The build tiers below describe implementation, not the audit fee.

Read the full service scope

The service pages show original designs and simulated records. These examples explain the work and its boundaries. They are not client case studies or performance results.

What it costs

Price the scope and the operation.

We agree the output, systems, access and acceptance cases before quoting a build. A paid automation audit can clarify uncertain scope and is credited on signing. Its fee is agreed separately. The implementation tiers below are not a fixed audit price.

We put the build scope, fee and payback estimate in writing using your baseline. You own the accounts, workflows and documentation. Software, hosting and AI usage are separate operating costs.

Automation builds

From $3,500 AUD

One process, rebuilt to run without you. Monitoring and documentation included.

Typical projects

$3,500 to $12,000 AUD

Several connected processes across two or more systems, where the data needs cleaning first.

Complex AI agent systems

$12,000 to $25,000 AUD

Agents that read unstructured information, decide and write back, with human review and a full audit trail.

Ongoing care plans

$750 to $2,500 AUD per month

Priced on how much you run and what your business loses the day one of them stops.

Compare the full scope and pricing

When something breaks

A clear owner. A safe next step.

The deliverable includes the operating decisions around the workflow. We define what is held, what can be retried safely and who receives an exception. A green dashboard is not enough if the business record never reaches the next person.

We account for a failed run, an empty result and a run that never starts. Your written care scope names alert ownership, recovery responsibilities and change boundaries. Support commitments belong in that scope.

Care is month to month and can be cancelled without penalty. You keep the system and its documentation, with no lock-in.

See ongoing support

A useful first conversation

Show us where the work gets stuck

Bring a representative record and the tools involved. We will discuss a practical first scope, the access it needs and the person who will operate it.

Book a call